Image from page 272 of "The New England journal of medicine" (1828)
Title: The New England journal of medicine
Year: 1828 (1820s)
Authors: Massachusetts Medical Society New England Surgical Society
Subjects: Medicine Surgery Medicine (General) Periodicals
Contributing Library: Gerstein - University of Toronto
Digitizing Sponsor: University of Toronto
Click here to view book online to see this illustration in context in a browseable online version of this book.
Text Appearing Before Image:
ent of instrumental aidsto exactness, and the art of medicine consequentljhas always adopted them with considerable reluct-ance. Take for example the two instruments uporwhich we place today our chief reliance for obtaininoordinary routine|clinical data—the thermometer andthe watch. Although the former instrument datesback to the time of Galileo, and was used by him asa means of estimating body temperature, the neces-sity of thermometric observations in disease had nowidespread clinical recognition until after the publi-cation of Wunderlichs classical monograph in 1868.Today one wishes to know, not as in pre-Boerhaav-ian times solely by manual palpation that there is amore or less evident pyrexia, but the degrees orfractions of degrees of variation, which our instru-ment of precision alone can supply. Galileo, also, > Read by invitation at the Boston Medical Library, Jan. 19,1903, VOL. CXLVIir, No. 10] BOSTON MEDICAL AND SURGICAL JOURNAL 251 Ki.ooi) IljKssuui; in£m.m. uv mkkcuim
Text Appearing After Image:
252 BOSTON MEDICAL AND SURGICAL JOURNAL [March 5, 1903 by shortening or lengthening the arm of a penduhimuntil it would oscillate synchronously with the pulse-rate, learned to speak with some accuracy of a 10-inch or a 12-inch pulse, and an English physi-cian, Sir John Floyer, in 1710, had constructed forhimself a chronometer with a second hand, his pulse-watch ; but not until long afterward did therate of the heart-beat come to be universally regis-tered with some numerical definiteness instead ofbeing spoken of merely as relatively rapid or slow. At the present time, largely owing to theconvenience of our timepieces, pulse-rate is com-monly recorded alongside of the temperature andperhaps of the respiration on our clinical charts, tothe utter neglect of a numerical record of that vascu-lar quality which in many conditions is incompar-ably of greater clinical consequence, namely, arterialtension. The familiar query is raised. Are we not surfeitedwith instruments of accuracy in clinic
Note About Images
Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original work.